Results tagged “college affordability” from EdLabor Journal

CQ Politics ran John Cranford's column yesterday explaining the logic behind the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act.

Two weeks ago, the House Education and Labor Committee, with the strong encouragement of the Obama administration, took a step toward ending the false premise that private lenders are full partners in the federally subsidized college loan program. If a bill approved by the committee becomes law, private lenders will be cut out of this program and will have to stop dining at their taxpayer-provided trough.
....
The lenders have held up the pretense that they provide better service than does an arm of the federal government and that there are actually differences among bank loans, so that students stand to benefit by picking one over the other.

Sorry, but that notion is a sham. Congress has long required that the terms of these loans be identical, regardless of whether they are issued by the government or a private lender. It doesn’t matter to the student where the money comes from — the dollar amounts, the interest rates and even the repayment terms are virtually the same.

For taxpayers, though, there is a difference, and it’s a big one. In the case of presumed “private” loans, the government pays more than it does for “direct” loans — billions of dollars more — because it guarantees the principal amount and it promises a minimal return to the lender. Banks are supposed to be compensated for taking risks, but in the case of government-subsidized student loans, they incur almost no risk. Yet they get compensated anyway.

Moreover, there’s ample evidence that some private lenders have engaged in questionable or worse behavior to persuade colleges to funnel student borrowers their way. When money is free, people will do all sorts of things to get their hands on it. And that raises questions about why lawmakers would want to perpetuate a system that promotes graft, as well as waste.

Learn more about the benefits of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act and read Mr. Cranford's complete column.

Stephen Burd at The Higher Ed Watch Blog has a very thorough post about some of the scare tactics from opponents of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act.Opponents have said that despite the $40 billion dollar increase to Pell Grants, it is a "setback for students" because it removes "the ability for borrowers to choose a lender."

As Mr. Burd so elegantly points out:

If there is anything that we learned from the "pay for play" student loan scandal, it is how little choice borrowers in the FFEL program actually have. Don't forget that in 2007, the Education Department found that one lender made at least 80 percent of students' federal loans at 921 participating colleges. That same year, the research firm Student Marketmeasure reported that 1,412 FFEL schools had one loan provider that made 80 percent of their students' federal loans, with 531 of those colleges recommending only a single lender to their students. What kind of a choice is that?

and as Rep. Tim Bishop (D-NY), a former Provost of Southampton College where he worked for 29 years, said at the markup of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, "I never once encountered a student who was focused on choice. What they were focused on was 'Can I get the money?' and 'Can you guarantee me that I can get the money?'"

We encourage you to read Mr. Burd's complete post as well as learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act.

Support for the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act

• President Obama's statement »


• 21st Century School Fund »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• AFL-CIO »
  (PDF, 46kb)
  
• AEC Science & Technology »
  (PDF, 121kb)
• American Association of Community Colleges »
  (PDF 74kb)
• American Association of School Administrators »
  (PDF, 45kb)
• American Association of State Colleges and Universities »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• American Association of University Women »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• American Council on Education »
  (PDF 37kb)
• American Federation of Teachers »
  (PDF 77kb)
• American Indian Higher Education Consortium »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• American Institute of Architects »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• Association for Career and Technical Education »
  (PDF, 49kb)
• Association of American Universities »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• Association of Community College Trustees »
  (PDF 74kb)
• Association of Educational Service Agencies »
  (PDF, 63kb)
  
• Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities »
  (16 kb)
• Association of Public and Land-grant Universities »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• Business Roundtable »
  (PDF, 52kb)
• California Charter Schools Association »
  (PDF, 71kb)
• Californians for Schools Facilities »
  (PDF 328kb)
• Campaign for America's Future »
  (PDF, 46kb)
• Campaign for College Affordability »
  (PDF 46kb)
• Campus Progress»
  (PDF, 26KB)
• Campus Progress Action »
  (PDF 42kb)
• Center for Law and Social Policy »
  (PDF, 66kb)
• Child Welfare League of America
  (PDF 73kb)
• Children Now »
  (PDF 116kb)
• Children's Defense Fund »
  (PDF, 74kb)
• College Board »
  (PDF 378kb)
• Council for Opportunity in Education »
  (PDF 64kb)
• Council of Educational Facility Planners International »
  (PDF, 63kb)
  
• Council of the Great City Schools »
  (PDF 62kb)
• Demos »
  (PDF, 46kb)
• Early Care and Education Consortium »
  (PDF, 60kb)
• Easter Seals Disability Services »
  (PDF, 132kb)
• Ecobuild America »
  (PDF 121kb)
• Education Finance Council »
  (PDF 23kb)
• EDUCAUSE »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• Fight Crime: Invest in Kids »
  (PDF, 606kb)
• First Five Years Fund »
  (PDF, 589kb)
• First Focus »
  (PDF, 339kb)
• Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• Knowledge Learning Corporation
  (PDF, 75kb)
• Mathematical Association of America »
  (PDF, 33kb)
• National Association for College Admission Counseling »
  (PDF 54kb)
• National Association for the Education of Young Children »
  (PDF, 42kb)
  
• National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies »
  (PDF, 1.34mb)
• National Association of Elementary School Principals
  (PDF, 51kb)
• National Association of Federally Impacted Schools »
  (PDF, 47kb)
• National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators »
  (PDF 121kb)
• National Black Child Development Institute »
  (PDF, 84kb)
• National Consumers League »
  (PDF, 46kb)
• National Direct Student Loan Coalition »
  (PDF 118kb)
• National Education Association »
  (PDF 62kb)
• National Fraternal Order of Police »
  (PDF 44kb)
• National Head Start Association »
  (PDF, 38kb)
• National PTA »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• National Rural Education Advocacy Coalition »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• National School Boards Association »
  (PDF 111kb)
• National Women's Law Center »
  (PDF, 34kb)
• Organizations Concerned About Rural Education »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• Pew's Pre-K Now »
  (PDF, 24kb)
• Rebuild America's Schools »
  (PDF, 63kb)
• Riverside Community College District »
  )PDF 126kb)
• Rock the Vote »
  (PDF, 46kb)
• State Higher Education Executive Officers »
  (PDF 67kb)
• The Institute for College Access & Success »
  (PDF, 30KB)
• UNCF »
  (PDF, 37kb)
• United States Green Building Council »
  (PDF, 72kb)
• United States Public Interest Research Group »
  (PDF 165kb)
• United States Student Association »
  (PDF, 970kb)
• US Action »
  (PDF, 46kb)
• Voices for America's Children »
  (PDF 73kb)
• The Workforce Alliance »
  (PDF 41kb)
• Zero to Three »
  (PDF 50kb)

This morning's Boston Globe editorial calls for ending taxpayer subsidy to banks who make no-risk federal student loans that are insured by the government. After going through the many new benefits under the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009, the Globe says this:

This taxpayer money is urgently needed to provide aid to students for whom a four-year college is out of reach. Earlier this week, Obama proposed to infuse $12 billion into community colleges. Another block of savings will give extra funding for Pell Grants and link them with cost-of-living increases.

In this economic climate, Congress must fix the broken system that unnecessarily takes money from taxpayers and students. Educational investments should go straight to students.

We encourage you to read the entire editorial, as well as learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009.

UPDATE: We also suggest you read the Washington Post article about Lifelines in the Student Loan Sea.

Chairman Miller has an op-ed in the Politico today about the plan to reform federal student loans.

Here it is in its entirety:

Fix loan system for a stronger future
By: Rep. George Miller

This summer, millions of students will sit down with their families to figure out how to pay for college. They will unwittingly enter into a financial lending system that is badly broken — and not benefiting them as intended.

However, if Congress and President Barack Obama are successful, this system is about to undergo a major change.

The college financing system that was supposed to ensure all students access to college is dangerously out of control, for three reasons.

First, tuition has skyrocketed and shows no signs of abating.

Second, the roller-coaster credit markets have put the federally guaranteed student loan program, which for years has originated almost three-quarters of all federal college loans, on life support.

The PJ Star has an article about the new benefits for graduates and students with federal loans that quotes Rep. Phil Hare (D-IL):

"This program will provide much-needed relief to Illinois students and families who are already struggling in this tough economy," said U.S. Rep. Phil Hare, D-Rock Island, who approved the legislation. "We should be rewarding those who pursue a higher education, not crippling them with debt. When the best and the brightest students can afford to go to college, we all benefit."

Learn more about the College Cost Reduction and Access Act and read other blog posts highlighting the many benefits.

While highlighting some of the other benefits that started yesterday, both the Washington Post and the Daily Texan pay specific attention to the public service loan forgiveness program under the College Cost and Reduction and Access Act.

The Washington Post explains how this benefit works:

Under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program, the Obama administration announced yesterday [although this provision was enacted 2 years ago by Congress], people with student loans can have their debts erased after 10 years of public service. Let's say Dr. Feelgood graduates from medical school with a mountain of student loan debt. Her heart, and a little angel on one shoulder, tell her to work in a clinic serving a low-income community on tribal lands, but that little devil on her other shoulder says to become a plastic surgeon in Beverly Hills. And the little devil is holding her empty pocketbook as evidence to back his case.

If the doctor follows her heart and makes 120 payments -- one a month for 10 years -- on her student loan, Uncle Sam will tell her to forget the rest of the money she owes.

and the Daily Texan speaks to a student who will benefit from the new provision because she is entering public service.

Elisheba Evans, a former UT English student who transferred to the University of North Texas, is paying off her UT-Austin student loans.

She said the program’s forgiveness clause will benefit her in her career choice as a science teacher.

“It’s good that there is a system in place to reward people going into [public service] because you aren’t making that much at all,” Evans said.

Learn more about public service loan forgiveness (pdf) and read other blog posts on the benefits from the College Cost Reduction and Access Act.

Today new benefits go into effect that will make monthly student loan payments more manageable and affordable for millions of students and borrowers struggling to stay afloat in this tough economic climate.

These benefits were enacted as part of the College Cost Reduction and Access Act, a law I sponsored in 2007 that made historic investments to help more Americans earn a college degree. With the economy against this year’s college graduates, this relief couldn’t come at a better time.

Jonathan Glater has an article in today's New York Times about the good news for college students and graduates starting on July 1st. The new benefits include lower interest rates on federally student loans and an option to lower monthly payments based upon one's income (see video below).

“These benefits are guaranteed, no matter what happens in our economy, and are kicking in at exactly the right time for millions of Americans,” said Representative George Miller, Democrat of California and chairman of the House education committee.

See Chairman Miller's complete statement here.


Source: IBRinfo.org

Today's Bangor Daily News has an excellent editorial about the Obama administrations efforts to simply the FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) form. Some changes will be immediate, while others will be phased in over the next several years. Rather than wait weeks, students will now be able to see estimates of Pell Grant and other student loan eligibility immediately. The number of questions will be reduced by about 20% to 150 and starting in January, for students who choose, they will be able to import relevant tax information from the IRS.

“Confusing paperwork shouldn’t stand between qualified students and a college degree,” said Rep. George Miller, a California Democrat who is chairman of the House Committee on Education and Labor. A law passed last year helped, creating a two-page form for some low-income families.

We encourage you to read the entire editorial and to learn from the Department of Education.

The Boston Globe's personal finance reporter, Jill Boynton, has a concise article about the new benefits for students with federal college loans that start on July 1, 2009.

But what if you have a job, but not a lot of income? Under the Income-Based Repayment plan (IBR) your payments are capped to no more than 15% of discretionary income, an amount that is based on the federal poverty guideline. "Discretionary income" is defined as the difference between adjusted gross income and 150 percent of the federal poverty line that corresponds to your family size and the state you live in (from www.finaid.org).

These new options apply to the Stafford, Grad Plus and federal consolidated loans and your loans must be in good standing. If you are unemployed, you can apply for a deferment of up to 3 years. Read the entire article and visit www.ibrinfo.org to learn more about the income-based repayment plan.

David Randall at Forbes.com has an article about the new Income-Based Repayment benefit that begins July 1st under the College Cost Reduction and Access Act. He explains how it will work:

First, income-based repayment will only be available for federal student loans that are in good standing. Under this plan, borrowers' monthly payments will be capped at 15% of the amount by which their income exceeds the federal poverty level (currently $16,245).

Let's say you have an adjusted gross income of $30,000. That means your pay exceeds the federal poverty level by $13,755 a year, or $1,146.25 a month. Under the new program, you would owe 15% of that amount, or $171.94, per month, regardless of your total outstanding loan balance.

If you left school owing $40,000 in federal loans, you would pay $460.32 a month under the standard 10-year plan. By choosing the income-based repayment plan, you would save 63% per month (by lengthening the life of the loan, however, you will end up paying more in interest over time.)

There are additional circumstances for married couples filing jointly, students in deferment, and medical students to consider. We encourage you to read the entire article (and use their cool income-based repayment calculator to see your potential monthly savings).

An op-ed by Gail Collins in today's New York Times discusses the need to reform student loans. After looking at the private loan sector, she then turns to the federally-guaranteed loans:

This is a system that goes something like this:

• We the taxpayers pay the banks to make loans to students.
• We the taxpayers then guarantee the loans so the banks won’t lose money if the students don’t pay.
• We the taxpayers then buy back the loans from the banks so they can make more loans to students, for which we will then pay them more rewards.

Are you with me so far? Wait, I see a hand waving back there. What’s that, sir? You want to know why the government doesn’t just lend the money out itself? Excellent question!

The White House estimates that it could save about $94 billion over 10 years if it cut out all the middlemen. And it has the basis of a system in place, since the Department of Education already makes a lot of direct loans to students.

We encourage you to learn more about the President's proposal, read the entire editorial and review the highlights from our recent hearing on this subject.

(This is a guest blog post by Rep. Tim Bishop, Education and Labor Committee Member.)

An article in Newsday recently declared that the “recession is pushing college out of reach.” That’s a sobering thought—particularly because a college education can be a key path to a stronger financial future for many Americans.

Current statistics on costs at local colleges and universities help explain why this is the case. At Stony Brook University on Long Island, the average debt incurred by 2007 graduates had increased by 9% over the previous year. That’s nearly three times the annual cost of living adjustment. Completing college in New York or any other state is an increasingly expensive proposition: the average student graduates with nearly $22,000 in debt. With the current economic downturn, a college degree may appear even further out of reach for many Americans.

As a former college administrator, I understand the importance of college affordability for American students. I am heartened by the steps that President Obama and my Congressional colleagues have taken to date, including the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This legislation includes billions of dollars to repair and construct school facilities and improve services for the children most in need, which will better prepare our next generation for the challenges of college and the globalized economy.

On July 1st, some new benefits for students will go into effect thanks to the College Cost Reduction and Access Act. On July 1, the interest rate on need-based federal student loans will be reduced to 5.6% down from the current 6% (rates will drop even further to 3.4% by 2011). The maximum Pell Grant scholarship will increase to $5,350 which will reduce the amount that students need to borrow in the first place. In addition, monthly loan payments may be capped at 15% of discretionary income, so student loans will become less of a burden on young people getting started in their careers.

Alex, a student on Long Island who will graduate with a whopping $70,000 in debt, puts it well: “Higher education shouldn’t come at the price of indebtedness for life.”

That’s a goal for our college graduates on which I hope we all can agree.

We can get there by increasing grant aid from all sources (federal, state, and institutional), making it less expensive for students and families to borrow, and working with institutions to implement best practices to hold down costs.

In today's Chicago Sun-Times, Terry Savage's Savage Truth column brings great news for recent college graduates.

Starting July 1, there will be new help for recent grads -- or those who have been out of school for a while and are struggling to repay student loans. The new federal Income-Based Repayment program will allow those with low incomes to pay as little as zero on their student loans, as long as they qualify based on income and amount of debt.

The rules are a little complicated, but you can visit www.IBRinfo.org. to use their online calculator to see if you are eligible.

Additional benefits that start on July 1 from the College Cost Reduction and Access Act include:

• increase in Pell Grants
• reduction in interest rates on federal loans from 6.0% to 5.6%
• TEACH grants for qualified undergraduate students who commit to teaching in public schools in high-poverty communities or high-need subject areas.
• Loan forgiveness after 10 years for public servants

We encourage you to read Ms. Savage's entire column and visiting our page on the College Cost Reduction and Access Act for more information.

President Obama has challenged every American to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training. And today he made it easier by ensuring that those receiving unemployment benefits won't lose them if they return to school. (from the AP article)

Currently, people who are out of work and want to go back to school have to give up their monthly unemployment check. And if they decide to return to school, they often don't qualify for federal grants because eligibility is based upon the previous year's income.

In addition to making it easier for those out of work to return for additional training, President Obama has been pushing for a transformation of the federal loan program to save taxpayers money and ensure stability for students. This USA Today editorial explains why this reform is important.

The student lending market is far smaller than the housing market. But it raises a similar question: Does it make sense for the government to pump its education dollars through banks — which divert some of the money for their own profits, wine and dine college financial aid officers to get on "preferred lender" lists, and lobby Washington to keep the spigot open?

The administration estimates it can save as much as $94 billion over 10 years by eliminating middlemen and lending directly. Even if that number is exaggerated, it reflects how inefficiently taxpayers' money is being spent. Banks shouldn't need major subsidies to issue guaranteed student loans.

To learn more about President Obama's proposal click here.

In today's paper, the New York Times has an article about the difficulty of paying for college. It follows Brennan Jackson, an A-student who ranks near the top of his high school class, as he tries to raise the $25,000 he still needs for his freshman year at the University of California, Berkeley, by stitching together a quilt of merit scholarships.

While Brennan’s situation, and the remedy he is pursuing, may sound extremely ambitious, guidance counselors across the country say they can recall no prior year in which so many applicants’ families have been squeezed by so many financial pressures.

Not only have families’ incomes been falling as their savings have dwindled, but also tuition has been rising — including proposed increases of nearly 10 percent next year throughout the University of California system....

Interest rates on student loans, including on popular federal programs like the unsubsidized Stafford (now nearly 7 percent) and Parent Plus (8.5 percent), are running several percentage points higher than the rates on secured loans, like home equity lines of credit.

“The difference of rates between secured and unsecured loans is higher than I have ever seen,” said Scott White, director of counseling services at Westfield High School in New Jersey. “This is one further impediment to access to post-secondary education for all but the well-to-do.”

President Obama has put forth a solid plan to make federal student loans more reliable, while saving taxpayers billions of dollars. To learn about the President's proposal, click here.

Chairman Miller on making college more affordable.



Will Congress pass Obama's student loan plan?

In today's News of the Day, the San Francisco Chronicle has an editorial about the importance for reform in the student loan industry. They say "one of the most sensible proposals in President Obama's budget would end federal subsidies for private lenders in favor of direct government loans."  And they take on several of the complaints about President Obama's proposal. For instance,

This proposal would not threaten private lenders' ability to make private loans to college students at unregulated (and often highly profitable) interest rates. It would simply allow the federal government to keep the profits from loans it already subsidizes, instead of handing them over to banks. It would improve efficiency and save money, and it should have been passed a long time ago.

And there is more at the San Francisco Chronicle and we encourage you to read the entire editorial.

To learn more about where Chairman Miller stands on this proposal, see his statement on President Obama's budget.

In today's New York Times, the editorial board declared, "The direct-lending proposal is clearly in the country’s best interest."

Private companies that reap undeserved profits from the federal student-loan program are gearing up to kill a White House plan that would get them off the dole and redirect the savings to federal scholarships for the needy. Instead of knuckling under to the powerful lending lobby, as it has so often done in the past, Congress needs to finally put the taxpayers’ interests first. That means embracing President Obama’s plan.

This builds upon Rep. Miller and the Education and Labor Committee's efforts in the 110th Congress.

We encourage you to read the entire editorial. And these from the Syracuse Post-Standard and the Albany Times Union.